Outschool
通貨、タイムゾーン、言語の設定を開く
ログイン

TDG: 「中尉、これからどうしますか?」軍事意思決定の歴史的ケーススタディ

生徒たちは、第一次世界大戦、第二次世界大戦、朝鮮戦争の実際の歴史的記録に基づいた難しい意思決定の状況に置かれます。「正しい」答えはありません。あるのは結果だけです。
Keith (M.A. Military History)
平均評価:
5.0
レビュー数:
(366)
クラス

含まれるもの

1 ライブミーティング
週あたりの授業時間数 55 分
この文章は自動翻訳されています

このクラスで学べること

英語レベル - 不明
米国の学年 7 - 10
Beginner - Intermediate レベル向け
In order for serious Military History students to develop a progressive deepening of understanding about the nature of command in battle; they need to develop a sense of empathy via a class such as this. Often in our studies we are too critical of past commanders without really understanding how difficult it might be to  make a decision. This class develops a student's critical and creative thinking skills to a high degree as well as the nature of tactical problem solving in small unit action in both world wars. 

The students will be given the opportunity to make situational decisions in real historical case studies about small unit leadership during WW1 and WW2. The process will be cooperative and collaborative as well as being guided by the teacher. There will be no 'right' or 'wrong' decision per se; it will be a matter of interpreting the situation through critical analysis and then creatively problem solving the tactical challenge presented by the scenario.

Each class will have a different decision-making scenario. A map and unit markers will be presented on the screen. A background to the tactical situation will be read, preliminary questions asked, then the students will work collaboratively to work out a solution to the tactical problem. With time remaining at the end of the lesson the students and the teacher will debrief and discuss the lessons learned. 

Week of 2 January - Team Bravo Resupply
Week of 9 January - Clearance of Kitchener Ridge
Week of 16 January - Linking up with Battalion 
Week of 23 January - Take the Hill
Week of 30 January - Ambush Patrol

Classes will continue using a large number of scenarios which will vary each week.

学習到達目標

Students will learn what is was like to make tough command decisions during WW1 and WW2.
Students will learn about small unit action in both world wars. 
Students will understand better the challenges of command decision making.
学習目標

その他の情報

保護者へのお知らせ
The students will be given the opportunity to make situational decisions in real historical case studies about small unit leadership during WW1 and WW2. The process will be cooperative and collaborative as well as being guided by the teacher. There will be no 'right' or 'wrong' decision per se; it will be a matter of interpreting the situation through critical analysis and then creatively problem solving the tactical challenge presented by the scenario.
外部リソース
学習者は、Outschoolが提供する基本ツール以外のアプリやウェブサイトを使用する必要はありません。
使用する教材
Antal, John F. “It’s Not the Speed of the Computer That Counts! The Case for Rapid Battlefield Decision-Making.” Armor, (May-June, 1998): 12-16. Banner, Gregory T. “Decision Making – A Better Way.” Military Review, (September-October 1997): 53-55. Beach, Lee R. and Terrence R Mitchell, “A Contingency Model for the Selection of Decision Strategies,” Academy of Management Review, vol. 3 (1978): 439-449. Diggins, S.L.C., “The Estimate and the Emperor’s New Clothes,” The British Army Review, no. 124 (2000): 4-12. Erev, Ido, Gary Bornstein, and Thomas S. Wallsten. “The Negative Effect of Probability Assessments on Decision Quality,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Making Processes, no. 55 (1993): 78-94. Foss, John W. “Command.” Military Review, (January-February 1997): 66-70. Howell, W.C., “Engineering Psychology in a Changing World,” Annual Review of Psychology, vol. 44 (1993): 241-258. Johnston, Joan H., Driskell, James E., and Salas, Eduardo. “Vigilant and Hypervigilant Decision Making,” Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 82 (1997): 614-622. Klein, Gary. “Strategies of Decision Making.” Military Review, (May 1989): 56-64. Klein, Gary and Major John F. Schmitt. “How We Plan.” Marine Corps Gazette, (October, 1995): 18-26. Krulak, Charles C. “Cultivating Intuitive Decisionmaking.” Marine Corps Gazette, (May, 1999): 18-22. Leser, Jeffrey W.S. “Battle Command: Vision for Success.” Military Review, (March-April 1997): 52- 59. Payne, John W. and James R. Bettman, “Behavioral Decision Research: A Constructive Processing Perspective.” Annual Review of Psychology, vol.43 (1992): 87-116. Rector, George E. “Leadership and Decisionmaking.” Marine Corps Gazette, (October, 1995): 21-23. Reisweber, Deborah. “Battle Command: Will We Have It When We Need It? Military Review, (September-October 1997): 49-58. Rogers, Charles T. “Intuition: An Imperative of Command.” Military Review, (March, 1994): 38- 50. Simon, Herbert A. “Background of Decision Making,” Naval War College Review (November, 1957): 1-24. Storr, Jim. “Real People, Real Decisions: Designing HQs to Win Wars.” British Army Review, no. 123 (1999): 7-19. Weis, Jeffrey S. “Information Mismanagement: The Quest for Certainty on the Battlefield.” Marine Corps Gazette, (October, 1998): 22-23. Wilson, Timothy D. and Schooler, Jonathan W. “Thinking Too Much: Introspection Can Reduce The Quality of Preferences and Decisions,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 60, no. 2 (1992): 181-192.
参加しました September, 2020
5.0
366レビュー
プロフィール
教師の専門知識と資格
修士号 American Military Universityから 歴史 へ
学士号 University of Maine at Farmingtonから 教育 へ
学士号 Acadia University (Nova Scotia, Canada)から 歴史 へ
As a long-term wargaming enthusiast with a MA in Military Studies (Land Warfare) - my thesis focused upon military decision making, I am very excited to offer this class. Military History has been a passion of mine since elementary school. I understand the study of Military History, battles, and commanders as a very good way to improve critical thinking and problem-solving. 

レビュー

ライブグループクラス
共有

$15

毎週
週に1回
55 分

14 人がクラスを受けました
オンラインライブ授業
年齢: 12-17
クラス人数: 3 人-10 人

About
サポート
安全性についてプライバシーCAでのプライバシー保護学習者のプライバシープライバシーの選択利用規約
アプリを入手
App StoreでダウンロードGoogle Playで入手する
© 2025 Outschool