每個孩子都應該知道的 9 個最高法院案例
未成年人的權利與成年人的權利有何不同？憲法對你有何影響？如果你還年輕，為什麼要關心政治？透過審查 9 個最高法院案件及其影響，在本一次性課程中了解答案。
Tess Tureson
平均評分：
5.0
評論數量：(23)
包含什麼
1 現場會議
55 分鐘 上課時間評估
We will be discussing each court case as a class. Students will be expected to identify what exactly their rights are as outlined by the court case and to decide whether they agree or disagree with the court ruling. If students desire a letter grade, I can send a worksheet upon request that follows the material we will be discussing, which I can then grade upon completion.等級
包括我們無法翻譯此文，請刷新頁面並再試一次。
課堂經歷
英語程度 - 未知
美國 9 - 12 年級
In this one-time, 55 minute class, we will go over 9 Supreme Court cases that revolve around the rights of minors and the impacts of each. The cases we will be looking at are: Tinker v. Des Moines Independent School District (1969) Issue: Freedom of Speech at School Bottom Line: You Have the Right To Express Yourself—Up to a Point Impact Case(s): Bethel School District v. Fraser; Frederick v. Morse New Jersey v. T.L.O. (1985) Issue: Privacy Rights at School Bottom Line: Your Belongings Can Be Searched, But Not Arbitrarily Ingraham v. Wright (1977) Issue: School Discipline Bottom Line: Teachers Can Use Corporal Punishment, If Your Locality Allows It Santa Fe Independent School District v. Jane Doe (2000) Issue: School Prayer Bottom Line: Public schools Cannot Sponsor Religious Activity Kent v. United States (1966) Issue: Juveniles and Serious Crime Bottom Line: Teens Can Be Tried as Adults Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier (1988) Issue: Student Journalism and the First Amendment Bottom Line: Schools Can Censor Student Newspapers Vernonia School District v. Acton (1995) Issue: Student Athletes and Drug Testing Bottom Line: Schools Can Require It Impact Case: Board of Education v. Earls, 2002 West Side Community Schools v. Mergens (1990) Issue: Student Clubs Bottom Line: Public Schools That Allow Student-Interest Clubs Cannot Exclude Religious or Political Ones DeShaney v. Winnebago County Social Services (1989) Issue: Constitutional Rights at Home Bottom Line: The Constitution Doesn't Protect Kids from Their Parents Get $3 off my classes with coupon code TURESFIRST3 until Aug 8, 2022. Look through my classes at https://outschool.com/teachers/Tess-Tureson and enter the coupon code at checkout.
學習目標
The purpose of this class is to show students why government matters to them and how their lives are shaped by their constitutional rights. It was also created to meet the Utah U.S. History Core Standard:
U.S. I Standard 4.3:
Students will use historic case studies and current events to trace how and explain why the rights, liberties, and responsibilities of citizens have changed over time.
其他詳情
父母的引導和規範
This class discusses court cases based on sensitive matters of abuse, corporal punishment, drug use, freedom of speech, freedom of the press, and religion in schools. If you have further questions, I have listed all the court cases in the class description and I am happy to provide clarification and further details upon request.
供應清單
We will be going through a reading about these court cases. If you would like a copy, let me know so I can send it to you. If you would like to receive a letter grade for this class, let me know ahead of time so I can send you the accompanying worksheet.
外部資源
學習者無需使用標準 Outschool 工具以外的任何應用程式或網站。
已加入 June, 2022
5.0
23評論
教師專業知識和證書
猶他州 教學證書 在 社會研究/歷史
I am a licensed Social Studies teacher in the state where I live. I taught this class as part of a unit on the U.S. Constitution in my high school U.S. History class.
I have several years of experience working with teens as a mentor, camp counselor, tutor, teacher, and debate coach.評論
一次性直播課程
US$18
每班單堂課
55 分鐘
有41 位學習者完成此課程
即時視訊會議
年齡: 14-18
2-6 每班學員人數
