Outschool
通貨、タイムゾーン、言語の設定を開く
ログイン

重要な意思決定の性質

意思決定は、リーダーが備えていなければならない最も重要なスキルの 1 つです。このクラスでは、リーダーが組織内で重要な意思決定を行う能力をどのように向上させることができるかについて説明します。
Keith (M.A. Military History)
平均評価:
5.0
レビュー数:
(354)
Popular
クラス

含まれるもの

20 ライブミーティング
20 授業時間
この文章は自動翻訳されています

このクラスで学べること

In this class, we examine why leaders and organizations make poor choices, digging deep into cognitive psychology, group dynamics, and theories of organizational culture and systems to help us understand why well-intentioned, capable people blunder. Moreover, we examine the techniques and behaviors that leaders can employ to improve decision making in their organization. We focus on how leaders can design decision-making processes that marshal the collective intellect in their organizations, bringing together the diverse expertise, perspectives, and talents to determine the best course of action.

The class uses case studies to examine decision making at three levels: individual, group, and organizational. 

To begin, we examine how individuals make choices. We show that most individuals do not examine every possible alternative or collect mountains of information and data when making choices. Instead, most of us draw on our experience, apply rules of thumb, and use other heuristics when making decisions. Sometimes, that leads us into trouble. As it turns out, most individuals are susceptible to what psychologists call cognitive biases—decision traps that cause us to make certain systematic mistakes when making choices. From there, we examine the intuitive process in great depth, showing that intuition is more than a gut instinct. Intuition represents a powerful pattern-recognition capability that individuals have, drawing from their wealth of past experience. However, intuition can lead us astray, and this course explains how and why that can happen, particularly when we reason by analogy.

In the second major part of the class, we examine how teams make decisions, recognizing that most of us do not make all our choices on our own. Instead, we often work in groups to make complex choices. We begin by asking the question, are groups “smarter” than individuals? We see that they can be, but in many cases, teams do not actually employ the diverse talents and knowledge of the members effectively. Thus, teams may experience a lack of synergy among the members. We show the problems that typically arise, such as groupthink—that is, the tendency for groups to experience powerful pressures for conformity, which suppress dissenting views and lead to clouded judgments. In our section on group decision making, we also examine why teams often find themselves riddled with indecision. Most importantly, though, we examine how groups can stimulate constructive
conflict, as well as achieve consensus and timely closure, so that they can overcome these problems and make better decisions.


Week of November 6  LECTURE 1 Making High-Stakes Decisions 
Week of November 13 LECTURE 2 Cognitive Biases
Week of November 20 LECTURE 3 Avoiding Decision-Making Traps
Week of November 27 LECTURE 4 Framing—Risk or Opportunity?
Week of December 4 LECTURE 5 Intuition—Recognizing Patterns
Week of December 11 LECTURE 6 Reasoning by Analogy 
Week of December 18 LECTURE 7 Making Sense of Ambiguous Situations 
Week of January 8 LECTURE 8 The Wisdom of Crowds?
Week of January 15 LECTURE 9 Groupthink—Thinking or Conforming?
Week of January 24 LECTURE 10 Deciding How to Decide
Week of February 5 LECTURE 11 Stimulating Conflict and Debate 
Week of February 12 LECTURE 12 Keeping Conflict Constructive 
Week of February 19 LECTURE 13 Creativity and Brainstorming 
Week of February 26 LECTURE 14 The Curious Inability to Decide
Week of March 4 LECTURE 15 Procedural Justice
Week of March 11 LECTURE 16 Achieving Closure through Small Wins
Week of March 18 LECTURE 17 Normal Accident Theory
Week of March 25 LECTURE 18 Normalizing Deviance
Week of April 1 LECTURE 19 Allison’s Model—Three Lenses 
Week of Apri  8 LECTURE 20 Practical Drift
Week of Apri 15 LECTURE 21 Ambiguous Threats and the Recovery Window
Week of Apri 25 LECTURE 22 Connecting the Dots
Week of May 6 LECTURE 23 Seeking Out Problems
Week of May 13 LECTURE 24 Asking the Right Questions

While the basic format for this class is LECTURE - the student should understand this class as a great opportunity to ask questions and should be prepared to participate in discussion based upon the topic presented. 

Strategic Study Skills Series #1  - The Art of Critical Decisionmaking
学習到達目標
Students will learn the nature of decision-making under time pressure and high-stakes
Students will learn about the essence of making a decision in positions of leadership
Students will encounter many case studies of decision-making
Students will learn about ways they can improve their decision-making
学習目標

その他の情報

保護者へのお知らせ
This class is designed to explore the process of decision-making using many historical case studies as well as practical examples.
外部リソース
学習者は、Outschoolが提供する基本ツール以外のアプリやウェブサイトを使用する必要はありません。
使用する教材
Allison, G. T. The Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis. Boston: Little, Brown, 1971. Amason, A. C. “Distinguishing the Effects of Functional and Dysfunctional Conflict on Strategic Decision Making.” Academy of Management Journal 39 (1996): 123–148. Ambrose, S. The Supreme Commander: The War Years of Dwight D. Eisenhower. New York: Doubleday, 1970. Bazerman, M. Judgment in Managerial Decision Making. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1998. Benner, P. From Novice to Expert: Excellence and Power in Clinical Nursing Practice. Menlo Park, CA: Addison-Wesley, 1984. Bourgeois, L. J., and K. Eisenhardt. “Strategic Decision Processes in High Velocity Environments: Four Cases in the Microcomputer Industry.” Management Science 34, no. 7 (1988): 816–835. Bower, J. Managing the Resource Allocation Process. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 1970. Boynton, A., and B. Fischer. Virtuoso Teams: Lessons from Teams That Changed Their Worlds. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Financial Times Press, 2005. Clark, M., with A. Joyner. The Bear Necessities of Business: Building a Company with Heart. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2006. This book, by the founder and CEO of Build-A-Bear, Columbia Accident Investigation Board. Columbia Accident Investigation Board Report. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 2003. Dekker, S. Just Culture: Balancing Safety and Accountability. Aldershof, UK: Ashgate, 2007. Drucker, P. F. The Practice of Management. New York: Harper, 1954. Edmondson, A. “Psychological Safety and Learning Behavior in Work Teams.” Administrative Science Quarterly 44 (1999): 354. Gavetti, G., D. Levinthal, and J. Rivkin. “Strategy-Making in Novel and Complex Worlds: The Power of Analogy.” Strategic Management Journal 26 (2005): 691–712. Gerstner, L., Jr. Who Says Elephants Can’t Dance? Inside IBM’s Historic Turnaround. New York: Harper Business, 2002. Janis, I. Victims of Groupthink. 2nd ed. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1982. (Janis articulates his theory of groupthink in this classic book with fascinating case studies about the Bay of Pigs, Cuban missile crisis, Korean War, Vietnam War, and Pearl Harbor.) Johnson, R. T. Managing the White House. New York: Harper Row, 1974. Kahneman, D., and A. Tversky. Choices, Values, and Frames. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000. Kelley, T. The Art of Innovation: Lessons in Creativity from IDEO, America’s Leading Design Firm. New York: Doubleday, 2001. 115 Kennedy, R. F. Thirteen Days. New York: W. W. Norton, 1969. This book provides a riveting firsthand account of the Cuban missile crisis. Kim, W. C., and R. Mauborgne. “Fair Process: Managing in the Knowledge Economy.” Harvard Business Review 75, no. 4 (1997): 65–75. Klein, G. Sources of Power: How People Make Decisions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1999. Knight, C. Performance without Compromise: How Emerson Consistently Achieves Winning Results. Boston: HBS Press, 2005. Krakauer, J. Into Thin Air: A Personal Account of the Mount Everest Disaster. New York: Anchor Books, 1997. Lind, A., and T. Tyler. The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice. New York: Plenum Press, 1988. Lind and Tyler extend the work of Thibault and Walker in this book. Nadler, D., J. Spencer, and associates, Delta Consulting Group. Leading Executive Teams. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1998. Schlesinger, A., Jr. A Thousand Days. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1965. Schweiger, D. M., W. R. Sandberg, and J. W. Ragan. “Group Approaches for Improving Strategic Decision Making.” Academy of Management Journal 29 (1986): 51–71. Snook, S. A. Friendly Fire: The Accidental Shootdown of U.S. Black Hawks over Northern Iraq. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2000. Starbuck, W., and M. Farjoun, eds. Organization at the Limit: Lessons from the Columbia Disaster. London: Blackwell, 2005. Stasser, G., and W. Titus. “Pooling of Unshared Information in Group Decision Making: Biased Information Sampling During Discussion.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 48 (1985): 1467–1478. Staw, B. M. “Knee Deep in the Big Muddy: A Study of Escalating Commitment to a Chosen Course of Action.” Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 16 (1976): 27–44. Staw, B. M., and H. Hoang. “Sunk Costs in the NBA: Why Draft Order Affects Playing Time and Survival in Professional Basketball.” Administrative Science Quarterly 40 (1995): 474–494. Staw, B. M., L. Sandelands, and J. Dutton. “Threat-Rigidity Effects on Organizational Behavior.” Administrative Science Quarterly 26 (1981): 501–524. Steiner, I. Group Process and Productivity. New York: Academic Press, 1972. Surowiecki, J. The Wisdom of Crowds: Why the Many Are Smarter than the Few and How Collective Wisdom Shapes Business, Economies, Societies and Nations. New York: Anchor Books, 2004. Tapscott, D., and A. Williams. Wikinomics: How Mass Collaboration Changes Everything. New York: Penguin, 2006. Thibault, J., and L. Walker. Procedural Justice: A Psychological Analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates, 1975. Turner, B. Man-Made Disasters. London: Wykeham, 1978. Ury, W. Getting Past No: Negotiating Your Way from Confrontation to Cooperation. New York: Bantam Books, 1993. Useem, M. The Leadership Moment: Nine Stories of Triumph and Disaster and Their Lessons for Us All. New York: Times Business, 1998. Wohlstetter, R. Pearl Harbor: Warning and Decision. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1962.
参加しました September, 2020
5.0
354レビュー
Popular
プロフィール
教師の専門知識と資格
修士号 American Military Universityから 歴史 へ
学士号 University of Maine at Farmingtonから 教育 へ
学士号 Acadia University (Nova Scotia, Canada)から 歴史 へ
I am a certified (7-12) Social Studies teacher and have taught a variety of honors level courses (AS/A Level, KS3, GCSE, I.B. and A.P.) in both private and public schools over the past 30 years. Historical writing, source analysis, and exam preparation as well as an immersive approach to the study of history has made my classes both meaningful and enjoyable. My tutoring experience has spanned the entire 21st century with ACT, SAT, SSAT, ISEE, A.P. Histories, and Subject Tests. My MA in Military History focused upon military decision-making during high-risk, time dependent situations. 

レビュー

ライブグループクラス
共有

$23

毎週または$450 20 クラス分
週に1回、 20 週間
60 分

4 人がクラスを受けました
オンラインライブ授業
年齢: 13-18
クラス人数: 3 人-15 人

About
サポート
安全性についてプライバシーCAでのプライバシー保護学習者のプライバシーデータ設定の管理利用規約
アプリを入手
App StoreでダウンロードGoogle Playで入手する
© 2024 Outschool